6 References

Achterberg, P., Koster, W., & van der Waal, J. (2017). A Science Confidence Gap:

Education, Trust in Scientific Methods, and Trust in Scientific Institutions in the United States, 2014. Public Understanding of Science, 26(6), 704–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515617367


Alldritt, R. & Wilcock, J. (2011). Why Measure Trust in Official Statistics?. UK

Statistics Authority. 58th World Congress of the International Statistical Institute. Dublin.  (Accessed 17th April, 2025)


Allegrezza, S. & Joxhe, M. (2022). Exploring the Determinants of Trust in Official

Statistics: Evidence from Luxembourg. Économie et Statistiques (Report Number 128).   https://statistiques.public.lu/dam-assets/catalogue-publications/economie-statistiques/2022/working-paper-02-22.pdf (Accessed April 27th, 2025)


Allum, N. (2008). Science Knowledge and Attitudes Across Cultures: A Meta-

Analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 35–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159


Alternmüller, M. S. et al. (2023). Science Communication Gets Personal: Ambivalent

Effects on Self-Disclosure in Science Communication on Trust in Science. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(4), 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000489


Altenmüller, M., Wingen, T. & Schulte, A. (2024). Explaining Polarised Trust in

Scientists: A Political Stereotype Approach. Science Communication, 46(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231221770


Baier, A. (1986). Trust and Antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381376


Bailey, R., Rofique, J. & Humphrey, A. (2010). Public Confidence in Official Statistics

  1. National Centre for Social Research. https://natcen.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-07/public-confidence-official-statistics-2009.pdf (Accessed May 10th, 2025)

Banerjee, S. et al. (2023). Strategies for Building Trust in News: What the Public Say

They Want Across Four Countries. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/strategies-building-trust-news-what-public-say-they-want-across-four-countries (Accessed May 12th, 2025)


Besley, J. (2015). Predictors and Perceptions of Scientists: Comparing 2001 to 2012.

Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 35(1-2), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467615604267


Bettis, J. (2024). Trust in News Providers. UK Parliament. Post.

https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/POST-PN-0727/POST-PN-0727.pdf (Accessed May 20th, 2025)


Blais, A. & Rubenson, D. (2012). The Source of Turnout Decline: New Values or

New Contexts?. Comparative Political Studies, 46(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453032


Blastland, M. (2020). Five Rules for Evidence Communication. Nature, 587(7834),

362–364.https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03189-1


Brennan, G. (1998). Democratic Trust: A Rational-Choice Theory View. In Braithwaite, V. & Levi., M. (Ed.), Trust and Governance, (pp.197–217) Russell Sage Foundation. ISBN. 0-87154-134-3


British Science Association. (2025). UKRI, Ipsos and the BSA Announce Launch of

2023 Public Attitudes to Science Survey. https://www.britishscienceassociation.org/news/launching-2025-public-attitudes-to-science-survey (Accessed 24th April, 2025)


Bunting, H., Gaskell, J. & Stoker, G. (2021). Trust, Mistrust and Distrust: A Gender

Perspective on Meanings on Measurements. Frontiers in Political Science, 3 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.642129


Buskens, V. (2002). Summary and New Perspectives. In Social Networks and Trust,

(pp.191–211) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b109038


Campaign for Science and Engineering. (2025). CaSE Public Opinion Research

Summary. https://www.sciencecampaign.org.uk/what-we-do/public-opinion/research/research-summary/#trust (Accessed 24th April, 2025)


Carter, J. A. & Simion, M. (n.d.). The Ethics and Epistemology of Trust. Internet

Encyclopaedia of Philosophy https://iep.utm.edu/trust/ (Accessed April 30th, 2025)


Chiche, J. & Chanvril, F. (2016). Confiance Dans Les Statistiques Publiques: Une

Relation Contrariée’ Statistics and Society, 4(3), 55–63. https://www.persee.fr/doc/staso_2269-0271_2016_num_4_3_1012 [google translated]


Citrin, J. & Stoker, L. (2018). Political Trust in a Cynical Age, Annual Review of

Political Science, 21, 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550


Clemence, M. & King, L. (2023). Trust in Politicians Reaches its Lowest Score in 40-

years. Ipsos. https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/ipsos-trust-in-professions-veracity-index-2023 (Accessed 18th April, 2025)


Cohen, M. A. & Isaac. M. S. (2021). Trust Does Beget Trustworthiness and Also

Begets Trust in Others. Social Psychology Quarterly, 84(2), 189–201 https://www.jstor.org/stable/48637025


Coleman, J. S. (1990). Relations of Trust. In Foundations of Social Theory (pp.91–

118), Harvard University Press. https://www.academia.edu/5875176/


Cologna, V. et al. (2025). Trust in Scientists and Their Role in Society Across 68

Countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 9, 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5


Cook, K. S., Hardin, R. & Levi, M. (2005). Cooperation without Trust? New York:

Russell Sage Foundation. ISBN:978-0-87154-165-9


Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C. & Gerbasi, A. (2006). Power, Dependence, and Social

Exchange. In P. J. Burke. (Eds.), Contemporary Social Psychological Theories. (pp.194–215) Stanford University Press. 99514171202346


Cook, K. S. & Santana, J. J. (2020). Trust: Perspectives in Sociology. In Simon, J.

(Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Trust in Philosophy (pp.189–204). Routledge. ISBN 9781138687462


Dancey, L. (2012). The Consequences of Political Cynicism: How Cynicism Shapes

Citizens Reactions to Political Scandals. Political Behaviour, 34(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9163-z


David, D. (2022, November 16th). Inflation: Why Price Rises Are Worse for Some

People than Others. BBC News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-62553641 (Accessed May 7th, 2025)


Deck, C. A. (2010). An Experimental Investigation of Trust and Sequential Trade’

Southern Economic Journal, 76(4), 993–1004. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27866739


Delgado-Márquez, B. L. et al. (2015). Does Knowledge Explain Trust Behaviours

and Outcomes? The Different Influences of Initial Knowledge and Experiential Knowledge on Personal Trust Interactions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(11), 1498–1513. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/09585192.2014.938679


Department for Business, Energy, Industrial Strategy. (2020). Public attitudes to science 2019. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f22cf7bd3bf7f1b1593c15c/public-attitudes-to-science-2019.pdf (Accessed 25th September, 2025)


Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. (2024). Public Attitudes to Data

and AI: Tracker Survey (Wave 4) Report, Trust in Data Actors and Views on the Use of Data in Society. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-attitudes-to-data-and-ai-tracker-survey-wave-4/public-attitudes-to-data-and-ai-tracker-survey-wave-4-report#trust-in-data-actors-and-views-on-the-use-of-data-in-society (Accessed 27th April, 2025)


Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and Suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(4), 265–

  1. http://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200401

Devine, D., Valgardsson, V., Jennings, W., Stoker, G. & Bunting, H. (2024). The

Causes of Perceived Government Trustworthiness. European Journal of Political Research, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12742


Dietz, G. (2011). Going Back to the Source: Why do People Trust Each Other?.

Journal of Trust Research, 1(2), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2011.603514


Edelman Trust Barometer. (2025). Global Report: Trust and the Crisis of Grievance.

Edelman Trust Institute. https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2025-01/2025%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20Global%20Report_01.23.25.pdf (Accessed 14th April, 2025)


Evans, G. & Durant, J. (1995). The Relationship Between Knowledge and Attitudes

in the Public Understanding of Science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004


Eyal, G. (2019). The Crisis of Expertise. Polity Books. ISBN: 9781509538874

Faulkner, P. R. (2018). Finding Trust in Government. Journal of Social Philosophy,

49(4),626–644. ISSN: 0047-2786


Fellegi, I. (2010). Report of the Electronic Working Group on Measuring Trust in

Official Statistics OECD. Meeting of the Committee on Statistics. Paris. https://isi-web.org/sites/default/files/import/files-2011/950889.pdf


Ferrin, D. L., Bligh, M. C. & Kohles, J. C. (2008). It Takes Two to Tango: An

Interdependence Analysis of the Spiralling of Perceived Trustworthiness and Cooperation in Interpersonal and Intergroup Relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.012


Frederiksen, M. (2014). Relational Trust: Outline of a Bourdieusian Theory of

Interpersonal Trust. Journal of Trust Research, 4(2) 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2014.966829


Freitag, M. & Ackermann, K. (2016). Direct Democracy and Institutional Trust:

Relationships and Differences Across Personality Traits. Political Psychology, 37(5), 707–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12293


Glynn. C. L., Hayes, A. F. & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived Support for One’s

Opinions and Willingness to Speak Out: A Meta-Analysis of Survey Studies on the “Spiral of Silence”, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 452–263. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2749581


Government Communications Service. (2022). Our Strategy for 2022-2025.

https://gcs.civilservice.gov.uk/about-us/government-communication-service-our-strategy-for-2022-to-2025/ (Accessed May 25th 2025)


Hamm, J. A., Smidt, C. & Mayer, R. C. (2019). Understanding the Psychological

Nature and Mechanisms of Political Trust. PLOS One, 14(5) 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215835


Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

ISBN. 978-0-87154-341-7


Hetherington, M. J. & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington Won’t Work. Chicago:

Chicago University Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo21516007.html


Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D. & Bromme, R. (2015) Measuring Laypeople’s Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI). PLoS ONE, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139309


Houston, D et al. (2016). Citizens Trust in Civil Servants: A Cross-National

Examination. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(4), 1203–1214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1156696


Humpherson, E. & Baugh, S. (2025, January 6th). Growing Public Trust in Statistics

Through Collaborative Communication and Intelligent Transparency. Government Analysis Function. https://analysisfunction.civilservice.gov.uk/blog/growing-public-trust-in-statistics-through-collaborative-communication-and-intelligent-transparency/ (Accessed May 20th, 2025)


Ipsos UK. (2023). Ipsos Veracity Index.

https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2023-12/ipsos-trust-in-professions-veracity-index-2023-charts.pdf (Accessed 18th April, 2025)


Ipsos UK. (2024). Ipsos Veracity Index.

https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2024-11/Veracity%20index%202024_v1_.pdf (Accessed 18th April, 2025)


Irwin, A. (2014). From Deficit to Democracy (Revisited). Public Engagement in

Science, 23(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513510646


Jones, K. (1996). Trust and an Affective Attitude. Ethics, 107(1), 4–25.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2382241?origin=JSTOR-pdf


Joslyn, S. & LeClerc, J. (2013). Decision with Uncertainty: The Glass Half Full.

Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 308–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721413481473


Keefer, P., Scartascini, C., Vlaicu, R. (2021). Trust, Populism and the Quality of

Government. In Bågenholm, A. et al., (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Quality of Government, (pp.249–267). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198858218


Kerr, J. et al. (2023). The Effects of Communicating Uncertainty Around Statistics,

On Public Trust. Royal Society Open Science, 10(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230604


Khan, G. (2025). These Newsrooms are Trying to Boost Trust Through

Transparency. Is It Working?. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/these-newsrooms-are-trying-boost-trust-through-transparency-it-working (Accessed May 12th, 2025)


Korsgaard, M. A. (2018). Reciprocal Trust: A Self-reinforcing Dynamic Process. In

Searle, R. H., Nienaber, A. I. & Sitkin, S. B. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Trust. (pp.14–28) Routledge. ISBN:9781315745572


Latusek, D. (2025). Trust in Public Governance: Scoping the Field. In Six et al., F.

(Eds.), Handbook on Trust in Public Governance. (pp.1–23). Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN: 9781802201390


Luhmann, N. (1979). Familiarity and Trust. In Trust and Power. (18–23) Wiley and

Sons. ISBN: 978-1-509-51945-3


Lyons, P. (2013). Impact of Salience on Differential Trust Across Political Institutions

in the Czech Republic. Czech Sociological Review, 49(3), 347–374.


Martin, A., et al. (2020). Political Probity Increases Trust in Government: Evidence

from Randomised Survey Experiments. PLoS One, 15(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225818


Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of

Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792


McCabe, K. & A Smith. V. L. (2000). A Comparison of Naïve and Sophisticated

Subject Behaviour with Game Theoretic Predictions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(7), 3777–3781 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.040577397


McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith. V. L. (2003). Positive Reciprocity and

Intentions in the Trust Game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52(2) 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00003-9


Mede, N. G. & Schäfer, M. (2020). Science-related Populism: Conceptualising

Populist Demands Towards Science. Public Understanding of Science, 29(5), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520924259


Mondak, J. & Halperin, K. (2008). A Framework for the Study of Personality and

Political Behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000173


Mont’Alverne, C. et al. (2022). The Trust Gap: How and Why News on Digital

Platforms in Viewed More Sceptically Versus News in General. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/trust-gap-how-and-why-news-digital-platforms-viewed-more-sceptically-versus-news-general – header–0 (Accessed May 20th, 2025)


Morelock, A. L. (2021). In Bureaucrats We Trust? Good Governance and Trust in

Civil Servants. Public Administrations Quarterly, 45(3), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.37808/paq.45.3.6


Müller, J. & Schwieren, C. (2020). Big Five Personality Factors in the Trust Game.

Journal of Business Economics, 90(1), 37–55. 10.1007/s11573-019-00928-3


National Centre for Social Research. (2024). Public Confidence in Official Statistics Survey. https://natcen.ac.uk/publications/public-confidence-official-statistics (Accessed 2nd April, 2025)


National Centre for Social Research. (2024). Trust and Confidence in Britian’s

System of Government at Record Low. https://natcen.ac.uk/news/trust-and-confidence-britains-system-government-record-low (Accessed 25th April, 2025)


Nielsen, R. & Fletcher, R. (2024). Public Perspectives on Trust in News. Reuters

Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2024/public-perspectives-trust-news (Accessed May 12th, 2025)


Nisbet, M. C. & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s Next for Science Communication?

Promising Directions and Lingering Distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767–1778. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041


NISRA Statistical Support Branch. (2025). Public Awareness of and Trust in Official

Statistics in Northern Ireland 2023. https://datavis.nisra.gov.uk/ssb/public-awareness-of-and-trust-in-official-statistics-northern-ireland-2023.html (Accessed 14th April, 2025)


OECD. (2024a). Trust in Government.

https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/trust-in-government.html (Accessed 14th April, 2025)


OECD. (2024b). OEDC Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions – 2024

Results: Building Trust in a Complex Policy Environment. https://doi.org/10.1787/9a20554b-en (Accessed 14th April, 2025)


Ofcom. (2024). TV Loses its Crown as Main Source for News.

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and-attitudes/attitudes-to-news/tv-loses-its-crown-as-main-source-for-news (Accessed May 12th, 2025)


Office for National Statistics. (2024). Trust in Government, UK: 2023.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/bulletins/trustingovernmentuk/2023 (Accessed April 25th, 2025)


Office for Statistics Regulation. (2022) A UK-wide Public Dialogue Exploring what

the Public Perceive as ‘Public Good’ Use of Data for Research and Statistics. https://osr.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/publication/a-uk-wide-public-dialogue-exploring-what-the-public-perceive-as-public-good-use-of-data-for-research-and-statistics/ (Accessed 18th May, 2025)


Office for Statistics Regulation. (2023). Statistical Literacy: It’s All in the

Communication. https://osr.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/publication/statistical-literacy-its-all-in-the-communication/ (Accessed May 20th, 2025)


Office for Statistics Regulation (2025) Statistics in Personal Decision-Making.

https://osr.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/publication/statistics-in-personal-decision-making/pages/7/ (Accessed April 30th, 2025)


O’Neill, O. (2013). What We Don’t Understand About Trust. [Video]. TED

Conferences. https://www.ted.com/speakers/onora_o_neill (Accessed 17th April, 2025)


O’Neill, O. (2018). Linking Trust to Trustworthiness. International Journal of

Philosophical Studies, 26(2), 293–300. 10.1080/09672559.2018.1454637


Peperzak, A. T. (2013). Trust: Who or What Might Support Us?. Fordham University

Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1c5ck36


Petts, J. (2008). Public Engagement to Build Trust: False Hopes. Journal of Risk

Research, 11(6), 821–835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870701715592


Pullinger, J. (2020). Trust in Official Statistics and Why it Matters. Statistical Journal

of the IAOS, 36(2), 343–346. https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-200632


PytlikZillig, L. M. & Kimbrough. C. D. (2016). Consensus on Conceptualisation and

Definitions of Trust: Are we there yet?. In Shockley, E., Neal, T. M., PytlikZillig, L. M., & Bornstein, B. H. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust: Towards Theoretical and Methodological Integration. (pp.17–48) New York: Springer. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-53125-002


Radermacher, W. J. (2020). Official Statistics 4.0: Verified Facts for People in the

21st Century. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31492-7


Riker, W. H. (1980). Political Trust as Rational Choice. In Lewin, L. & Vedung, E.

(Eds.), Politics as Rational Action. Theory and Decision Library, 23. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8955-9_1


Rotter, J. (1967). A New Scale for the Measurement of Interpersonal Trust. Journal

of Personality, 35(4), 521–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x


Rousseau, D. et al. (1998). Not So Different After All: A Cross-discipline View of

Trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617


Ruppert, E et al. (2018). Citizen Data and Trust in Official Statistics. Economics and

Statistics, no. 505-506, 171–184. doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2018.505d.1971 


Schäfer, M. (2016). Mediated Trust in Science: Concept, Measurement and

Perspectives for the ‘Science of Science Communication’. Journal of Communication, Communication Science: Trust and the New Media Ecology, 15(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15050302


Schranz, M., Schneider, J. & Eisenegger, M. (2018). Media Trust and Media Use. In

Otto, K. & Köhler, A. (Eds.), Trust in Media and Journalism (pp.73–91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20765-6_5


Sense About Science. (n.d.). Evidence Transparency Framework.

https://senseaboutscience.org/transparency-of-evidence/evidence-transparency-framework/ (Accessed May 20th, 2025)


Seyd, B., Jennings, W., & Hamm, J. (2022). People Who Trust Scientists are more

likely to get a Covid-19 Vaccine. So, what Traits make Scientists Trustworthy?. British Politics and Policy at LSE. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/covid-vaccine-trust/ (Accessed 14th April, 2025)


Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G. & Roth, C. (2020). Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust

and Risk/Benefit Perception. Risk Analysis, 20(3), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.203034


Simion, M. (2023). Knowledge and Disinformation. Episteme, 21(4), 1208–1219.

https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2023.25


Six, F. E. & Latusek, D. (2023). Distrust: A Critical Review Exploring a Universal

Distrust Sequence. Journal of Trust Research, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2023.2184376


Smirnova, M. & Scanlon, P. (2016). Experience and Cultural–Repertoire Based

Avenues of Trust: An Analysis of Public Trust in Statistical Agencies and their Data. Social Policy and Society, 16(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474641500069X


STATEC. (2023). Trust in Institutions, Democracy and Official Statistics.

https://statistiques.public.lu/dam-assets/catalogue-publications/regards/2023/regards-11-23.pdf (Accessed 4th April, 2025)


Statistics Commission. (2004). Legislation to Build Trust in Statistics: Report by the Statistics Commission (Report No. 18). https://uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/tempdocs/report-18–legislation-to-build-trust-in-statistics–may-2004-.pdf (Accessed 17th April, 2025)


Statistics Commission. (2005). Official Statistics: Perceptions and Trust. (Report No. 24). https://uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/tempdocs/report-24–official-statistics—perceptions-and-trust.pdf (Accessed 26th September 2025)


Statistics Commission. (2008). Official Statistics: Value and Trust. (Report No. 38).

https://uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/tempdocs/report-38–official-statistics—value-and-trust–january-2008-.pdf (Accessed 17th April, 2025)


Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/17643/2/28.pdf


Taber, S. & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated Scepticism in the Evaluation of Political

Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x


Taylor, M., Kennedy, H. & Oman, S. (2023) Challenging Assumptions About the

Relationship Between Awareness of and Attitudes to Data. Uses Amongst the UK Public. The Information Society, 40(1), 32–53. doi:10.1080/01972243


The British Academy. (2024). Public Trust in Science-for-Policymaking.

https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/publications/public-trust-in-science-for-policymaking/ (Accessed 23rd April, 2025)


Tsfati, Y. & Ariely, G. (2013). Individual and Contextual Correlates of Trust in Media

Across 44 Countries. Communication Research, 41(6), 760–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213485972


UK Statistics Authority. (2010). Strengthening User Engagement. (Monitoring Report

7). https://uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/images-strengthening-user-engagement-final-report_tcm97-32795-1.pdf (Accessed 17th April, 2025)


Van de Walle, S. & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Public Service Performance and Trust in

Government: The Problem of Causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8), 891–913. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120019352


Van der Bles, A. et al. (2019). Communicating Uncertainty About Facts, Numbers

and Science. Royal Society Open Science, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181870


Van der Meer, T. (2010). In What We Trust? A Multi-level Study into Trust in

Parliament as an Evaluation of State Characteristics. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852310372450


Van der Meer, T. & Zmerli, S. (2017). The Deeply Rooted Concern with Political

Trust. In Van der Meer, T. & Zmerli, S. (Eds.), Handbook on Political Trust. (pp. 1–16) Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545118.00010


Van Ryzin, G. (2011). Outcomes, Process and Trust of Civil Servants. Journal of

Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 745–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq092


Verhoest, K. (2024). Trust and Distrust in Public Governance Settings:

Conceptualising and Testing the Link in Regulatory Relations. Journal of Trust Research, 14(2), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2024.2383918


Weber, J., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2005). Normal Acts of Irrational Trust:

Motivated Attributions and the Trust Development Process. Research in Orgonisational Behaviour: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, 26, 75–101. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-08763-003


Weinberg, J. (2023). It Takes Two to do the Trust Tango: Politicians’ Trust

Perceptions and why they Matter. Political Insight, 14(4), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/20419058231218327


Wiesehomeier, N. & Ruth-Lovell, S. P. (2024). Trust the People? Populism, Trust

and Support for Direct Democracy. Politics and Governance, 12, 1–18. ISSN: 2183-2463


Wintterlin, F. et al. (2022). Predicting Trust in Science: The Role of Basic

Orientations Towards Science, Perceived Trustworthiness of Scientists, and Experiences with Science. Frontiers in Communication: Science and Environmental Communication, 6, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.822757


Yang, K. & Holzer, M. (2006). The Performance-Trust Link: Implications for

Performance Measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00560.x


Younger-Khan, S., Weidmann, N. B. & Oswald, L. (2024). Consistent Effects of

Scientistic Characteristics of Public Trust Across Political Regimes. Humanities, Social Science Communication, 11(1379), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03909-2


Zeelenberg, K. & se Bie, S. (2012). Trust and Dissemination in Official Statistics.

Statistics Netherlands (Discussion Paper 201220) ISSN: 1572-0314 


 

Back to top
Download PDF version (949.71 KB)