References

Aitken, M., Jones, K. H., Kaarakainen, M., Lugg-Widger, F., McGrail, K., McKenzie, A., Moran, R., Murtagh, M. J., Oswald, M., & Paprica, A. (2019). Consensus statement on public involvement and engagement with data-intensive health research. International Journal of Population Data Science, 4(1).

https://ijpds.org/article/view/586/2829

Atkinson, S., Badger, S., Milne, R., & Brayne, C. (2017). Ethical, legal and social issues in dementia research. Dementias Platform UK.

https://www.dementiasplatform.uk/about-us/our-achievements/research-project-reports

Cowan, M. L. & Humpherson, E. (2020). The Public Good of Statistics. What we know so far. Office for Statistics Regulation.

https://osr.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/publication/the-public-good-of-statistics-what-we-know-so-far/

Data Analytics Research Environments UK & Kohlrabi Consulting. (2022). Building a trustworthy national data research infrastructure: A UK-wide public dialogue.

https://dareuk.org.uk/public-dialogue-building-a-trustworthy-national-data-research-infrastructure/

Elias, P. (2021). Promoting public engagement with longitudinal research: A report to the Economic and Social Research Council. Warwick Institute for Employment Research.

https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ESRC-020322-Promoting-public-engagement-with-longitudinal-research.pdf

Health Data Research UK. (2021a). Population Research UK. Design and Dialogue Consultation.

https://www.hdruk.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Annex-1-PRUK-Design-and-Dialogue-first-consultation-summary.pdf

Health Data Research UK & Kohlrabi Consulting. (2021b). Public and Participant Involvement in Population Research UK (PRUK): A scoping review of different approaches and recommendations.

https://www.hdruk.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Annex-2-PRUK-PPIE-Scoping-Review_final.pdf

Involve, Carnegie UK Trust, & Understanding Patient Data. (2018). Data for Public Benefit.

https://www.carnegieuktrust.org.uk/publications/data-for-public-benefit/

Jones, K. H., Heys, S., Thompson, R., Cross, L., & Ford, D. (2020). Public involvement and engagement in the work of a data safe haven: a case study of the SAIL Databank. International Journal of Population Data Science, 5(3), 1-10.

https://ijpds.org/article/view/1371/2815

Kispeter, E. (2019).  Public support for accessing and linking data about people from various sources: Literature review. Warwick Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick.

https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ESRC-020322-Public-support-for-accessing-and-linking-data-about-people-from-various-sources.pdf

Morrow, E. (2020). Administrative Data: Missed use vs miss use. Administrative Data Research UK.

https://www.adruk.org/news-publications/news-blogs/administrative-data-misuse-vs-missed-use-133/

Scott, K. (2018). Data for Public Benefit: Balancing the risks and benefits of data sharing Involve, Carnegie UK Trust and Understanding Patient Data.

https://involve.org.uk/resources/publications/project-reports/data-public-benefit-balancing-risks-and-benefits-data-sharing

Waind, E. (2020). Trust, Security and Public Interest: Striking the Balance; A review of previous literature on public attitudes towards the sharing and linking of administrative data for research. Administrative Data Research UK.

https://www.adruk.org/fileadmin/uploads/adruk/Trust_Security_and_Public_Interest-_Striking_the_Balance-_ADR_UK_2020.pdf

UK Data Service. What is the Five Safes framework?

https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/help/secure-lab/what-is-the-five-safes-framework/

UK Statistics Authority. (2018). Research Code of Practice and Accreditation Criteria.

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/digital-economy-act-part-5-data-sharing-codes-and-regulations/research-code-of-practice-and-accreditation-criteria